ReviewJournal of pharmacopuncture2026
Effectiveness of Herbal Medicine Compared to Antidepressants in Patients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders Accompanied by Depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of pharmacopuncture, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Depression affects approximately 28.6% of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). Although herbal medicine (HM) has been proposed as a therapeutic option, its comparative effectiveness relative to antidepressants remains uncertain. This systematic review compared HM with antidepressants as adjuncts to antipsychotics in patients with SSD and comorbid depression. Methods: Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to January 15, 2025, without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared HM plus antipsychotics with antidepressants plus antipsychotics in patients with SSD and depression were included. Primary outcomes were depressive symptom scores (Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) and response rates. Secondary outcomes included overall psychiatric symptoms and adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool; certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Results: Seven RCTs comprising 505 participants were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference between HM and antidepressants in depressive symptoms (SMD -0.19, 95% CI [-0.54, 0.15]; very low-certainty evidence), response rates (RR 1.00, 95% CI [0.96, 1.04]; low-certainty evidence), or overall psychiatric symptoms (SMD -0.06, 95% CI [-0.84, 0.73]; low-certainty evidence). Adverse event rates showed a nonsignificant trend favoring HM (RR 0.56, 95% CI [0.06, 5.26]; low-certainty evidence). Conclusion: Very low- to low-certainty evidence suggests no significant difference in effectiveness between HM and antidepressants as adjuncts to antipsychotics for depression in SSD. Although HM may serve as an alternative, high-quality, large-scale trials are required to establish definitive conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.