Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41953480›Full record

ArticleChemical science2026

Synthesizability

Dominik Dekleva, Alexey Voronov, Jon Paul Janet, Albin Ekborg, Jure Borišek, Martina H Rambaher, Hannes H Loeffler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dominik DeklevaNational Institute of Chemistry Hajdrihova 19 Ljubljana 1000 Slovenia dominik.dekleva@ki.si.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1685-541X
Alexey VoronovMolecular AI, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0709-4954
Jon Paul JanetMolecular AI, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7825-4797
Albin EkborgMolecular AI, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca Gothenburg Sweden.
Jure BorišekNational Institute of Chemistry Hajdrihova 19 Ljubljana 1000 Slovenia dominik.dekleva@ki.si.
Martina H RambaherFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia.
Hannes H LoefflerMolecular AI, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca Gothenburg Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generating novel, drug-like molecules with realistic synthetic pathways is an essential goal in computer-aided drug discovery, yet generative models often lack synthesis awareness, resulting in compounds that are difficult or impossible to produce. To overcome this limitation, models must optimize not only molecular properties but also synthetic feasibility, which is not fully meaningful unless it incorporates specific factors like preferred reactions and available starting materials. Moreover, generating singleton compounds without respecting possibilities for parallel synthesis greatly increases the cost and complexity of synthesizing multiple proposed molecules. In practice, medicinal chemistry workflows group compounds into families sharing coherent synthetic strategies and common intermediates, enabling efficient parallel and automated synthesis. Here we introduce SynthSense, a reinforcement learning framework that guides molecular design using retrosynthetic feedback. SynthSense offers extrinsic reward functions that assess molecule-level feasibility, such as adherence to available building blocks and preferred reactions, or synthesizability

Identifiers

PMID41953480
PMCPMC13054889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.