ArticleQatar medical journal2026
Comparison of
Article in Qatar medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Skin closure techniques in inguinal hernia surgery significantly influence postoperative outcomes, including pain, healing, scar formation, and patient satisfaction. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care center from November 2023 to October 2025. Seventy patients aged 18-60 years undergoing inguinal hernia repair were randomly assigned to two groups: Group 1 (sutures) and Group 2 (tissue adhesive). Exclusion criteria included recurrent or strangulated hernia, allergies to cyanoacrylate/formaldehyde, and immunocompromised states. Outcomes assessed included pain (VAS), wound healing (Hollander score), scar quality (Vancouver Scar Scale and Visual Analogue Scar Scale), complications, and satisfaction scores. Results: Group 2 showed significantly lower pain scores at early postoperative intervals ( Conclusion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.