ReviewThe World Allergy Organization journal2026
Impact of systemic steroids on asthma biomarkers: A comprehensive analysis.
Review in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease characterized by variable airflow obstruction and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, affecting millions worldwide and showing heterogeneity in its endotype, clinical presentation, and severity. Following the principles of modern precision medicine, studying an asthmatic patient involves collecting various biomarkers that may assist in diagnosis, management, and characterization of the disease to predict clinical outcomes and treatment responses. Although systemic corticosteroid use should be limited to specific situations, this therapy still plays a crucial role in managing an asthmatic patient, especially during exacerbations. While it is known that steroids can affect biomarkers, the extent of this impact is often unclear. This remains an open issue, particularly in patients with severe asthma, where systemic steroids are more frequently used and biomarker measurement can deeply influence management and even access to therapy. Misinterpreting biomarkers can lead to over- or underestimating asthma severity, potentially resulting in serious consequences. In this comprehensive analysis, we have collected the available literature data on how systemic corticosteroids can affect different biomarkers used in clinical practice and research setting, categorizing them into humoral (eg, blood eosinophil count, total and specific IgE, alfa-1 antitrypsin, interleukins, eosinophil cationic protein, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin), instrumental (eg, spirometry, impulse oscillometry, fractional and multiple flow exhaled nitric oxide, and nasal nitric oxide), and clinical (ear-nose-throat and gastroenterological evaluation). The goal is to provide a practical and concise overview of this impact to assist clinicians in interpreting biomarkers independently of steroid therapy. Research should focus on developing predictive models that adjust individual biomarker readings for steroid dosage and duration, as well as markers less affected by corticosteroid interference. A detailed understanding of steroid-induced biomarker modulation is crucial for accurate asthma phenotyping, personalized treatment choices, and avoiding adverse outcomes caused by both under- and overtreatment. Going forward, integrating improved biomarker correction methods, enhancing patient education on steroid use, and continuing research into new inflammatory markers will be crucial for improving the accuracy and effectiveness of asthma management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.