ArticleBiodiversity and conservation2026
Assessing direct effects of insect change on insectivore populations in the United Kingdom.
Article in Biodiversity and conservation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Declines in insect abundance are a cause for concern, with potential downstream impacts on ecosystem function. Insects are key food resources for insectivorous vertebrates, with evidence that reductions in prey availability may influence population dynamics. Yet quantifying direct effects at large spatial scales is difficult, both due to data limitations and because correlations may reflect shared responses to environmental change rather than trophic links. We assess the role of insect abundance in the dynamics of 10 insectivores (five birds, five bats) in the United Kingdom by pairing insect and vertebrate abundance data at three spatial resolutions (100, 50, 10 km) from multiple citizen science programmes. To address the challenges of inference and combining heterogeneous data, we adopt a multiple-specification approach spanning: (1) association, (2) prediction, and (3) causal inference. We found evidence of overall declines for all bird species evaluated and for most indices of insect abundance, though none of the bat species tested showed consistent declines. Despite indices of both insect and bird abundance declining, declines did not always co-occur spatially. We also detected only moderate evidence of links between insect change and insectivore population change, notably blue tit and great tit with moth abundance, and grey partridge with Diptera abundance. Across taxa, spatial scales, and analytical approaches, we did not find consistent evidence that changes in insect abundance are a dominant driver of insectivore declines. Both insects and insectivores may instead be responding to multiple, and sometimes non-overlapping, pressures associated with environmental change. We emphasise that absence of strong evidence does not imply absence of effect, and highlight the difficulties of drawing direct conclusions from heterogeneous observational monitoring data. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10531-026-03329-5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.