SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Personality, capability, and context: a 30 year integrative review and theoretical expansion of the Big Five framework.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Behavioral Profiles in Romanian Resident Physicians: An Exploratory Study with Implications for Medical Education and Human Resource Development.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The relationship between personality and success in language production tasks in pre-medical education.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Personality assessments based on the Big Five framework remain widely used in employee selection and organizational research. However, debates persist regarding their predictive strength and practical relevance across dynamic workplace contexts. This study revisits these debates by examining how personality traits interact with individual capabilities and contextual factors in predicting job performance. Methods: This integrative review followed PRISMA guidelines and analyzed peer-reviewed studies published between 1991 and 2024. Literature was searched across Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and the Saudi Digital Library. A total of 315 records were identified, 125 duplicates were removed, and 190 studies were screened. After the eligibility assessment, 43 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed using descriptive synthesis, thematic coding, and alignment with an integrative framework. Results: The review found that conscientiousness consistently emerged as the strongest predictor of job performance across occupations. Other traits, such as extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and neuroticism, showed more context-dependent relationships with performance outcomes. Across the analyzed studies, three major themes emerged: (1) personality traits as behavioral resources, (2) capabilities such as learning agility, adaptability, and job crafting as mechanisms translating traits into behavior, and (3) contextual moderators including job design, leadership climate, and cultural environment. Discussion: The study proposes the Trait-Capability-Context (TCC) model, which explains how personality traits interact with individual capabilities and organizational environments to influence performance outcomes. The model suggests that traits alone are insufficient predictors of job performance and must be considered alongside capability development and contextual conditions. This integrative framework provides a more realistic foundation for employee selection and talent development, highlighting the need for future research using longitudinal and multi-level designs that model how traits, capabilities, and contexts interact dynamically over time, across careers, and under dynamic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.