ArticleIEEE robotics and automation letters2026
Validation of Dynamic Bayesian Optimization for a Non-Stationary Human-in-the-Loop Optimization Problem.
Article in IEEE robotics and automation letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation of Dynamic Bayesian Optimization for Human-in-the-Loop Optimization of Exoskeleton Control at User-Driven Walking Speed.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human-in-the-Loop Optimization (HILO) has demonstrated efficacy in achieving a plethora of assistive or augmentative effects. However, conventional optimizers such as Bayesian optimization (BO) do not account for the non-stationary aspects of the human-robot system, and may thus be limited in the domains of robot-assisted training or rehabilitation. In this study, we implemented HILO using dynamic Bayesian optimization (DBO) to define the optimal value of a single control parameter to target a desired effect in propulsion mechanics, specifically in the maximum hip extension (HE) angle during stance. Sixteen healthy participants received unilateral hip torque pulses via a hip exoskeleton for about 15 minutes while walking on a treadmill. Exoskeleton torques were determined via HILO using DBO or BO. Unbeknownst to the optimizers, treadmill speed was gradually increased to amplify the non-stationary behavior of the system. Experimental results revealed that DBO outperformed BO in the later stages of training, leading to improved cost and to final values of torque closer to the true value. The primary difference between optimizers arose from their ability to model the history-dependent relationship between applied torque and output. BO associated later deviations between expected and measured output to process noise, while DBO developed a more accurate predictive model of the input-output relationship that gave proper weighing to past datapoints for making predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.