ArticleHealth policy OPEN2026
Variations in Nurse Practitioner full practice authority in the United States: Difference in difference analysis of access and health Performance at a national level.
Article in Health policy OPEN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Authority over healthcare professional regulation in the United States rests with individual states, resulting in varied timelines and approaches to granting nurse practitioners (NPs) full practice authority (FPA). The impact of these policy changes on healthcare utilization and patient outcomes remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate the effect of NP full practice authority on healthcare access and patient outcomes across U.S. states. Methods: We applied a staggered difference-in-differences model using data from state legal statutes and the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (1997-2018). Analyses included all 50 states and the District of Columbia to assess changes in healthcare utilization-specifically, NP-provided primary care visits, physician visits, and emergency department (ED) use-before and after FPA enactment. Results: States adopting NP full practice authority experienced a modest but significant increase in NP primary care visits without a corresponding decline in physician visits. Additionally, non-urgent ED utilization decreased in states with FPA, suggesting improved access to primary care. Patient-reported activities of daily living improved modestly, indicating potential health benefits associated with expanded NP authority. Conclusions: Granting full practice authority to nurse practitioners enhances access to care, optimizes healthcare utilization, and may yield modest improvements in patient outcomes. These findings support the role of FPA policies in strengthening the primary care workforce while maintaining quality of care. Future research should explore long-term impacts and broader health system effects as additional states implement or modify FPA legislation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.