Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41953157›Full record

ArticleGMS journal for medical education2026

Promoting professional identity through peer support during studies: A report on the peer support in medical education project.

Iris Warnken, Ann-Kathrin Schindler, Dominik Hinzmann, Andreas Igl, Thomas Rotthoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iris WarnkenUniversity of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Didactics and Educational Research (DEMEDA), Augsburg, Germany.
Ann-Kathrin SchindlerUniversity of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Didactics and Educational Research (DEMEDA), Augsburg, Germany.
Dominik HinzmannTUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Munich, Department of Clinical Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Andreas IglPSU-Akut e.V., Munich, Germany.
Thomas RotthoffUniversity of Augsburg, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Didactics and Educational Research (DEMEDA), Augsburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Poor well-being, burnout and depression are prevalent among doctors, who are exposed to a variety of stresses and crisis situations. Even medical students have been described as prone to burnout due to 'relentless demands on themselves' [Mata DA et al., JAMA. 2015] or as vulnerable to illness from poor coping with psychosocial stress and the use of dysfunctional coping strategies [Puthran R et al., Med Educ. 2016]. In the model degree programme in human medicine at the University of Augsburg, students are offered peer support, with the aim of establishing self-care and collegial care which contribute to the development of professional identity. Collegial resources are used as both primary and secondary preventive measures in personal, study-related or clinic-related crises. Project description: Since 2022, training of student peers has been provided as part of a three-day elective course in cooperation with Munich's PSU-Akut e.V., which, since 2019, has successfully implemented the concept of collegial support following serious incidents in the healthcare sector, for example at the University Hospital in Augsburg. Demand to date: By March 2025, 25 student peers had undergone training, which focuses on the practical and reflective practice of conversation processes, self-awareness, practising key peer communication skills, dealing with boundaries, stress-inducing thoughts, background knowledge on coping strategies and quick-acting stress-reduction strategies. As of March 2025, 42 peer-to-peer conversations had been documented. Contact was established by approaching peers in person, either by email or telephone. The main reasons for seeking support were perceived exhaustion and feeling overwhelmed by the amount of material to be covered - especially in combination with individual life circumstances, exam anxiety and perceived pressure to succeed. Conclusion: Based on initial experiences, the provision of student peer support can serve as a building block of professionally implemented identity development, in which self-care and collegial care are natural components of one's own professional identity. The support offered by faculty as a primary and secondary preventive measure was found to be appreciated by some of the students (as expressed, for example, in evaluations and to the student and clinical mentors in mentoring groups). However, as in hospitals, such support should be continuously promoted during the establishment phase to ensure it becomes and remains widely known as a low-threshold option. Scientific proof of its effectiveness is currently being planned but is not yet available.

Indexed as

Peer GroupSocial SupportStudents, MedicalAdaptation, PsychologicalBurnout, ProfessionalCoping SkillsEducation, MedicalEducation, Medical, UndergraduateGermanyHumanscollegial caremedical identitymedical studentsmedical studiesmental healthpeer supportprofessional identityself-care

Identifiers

PMID41953157
PMCPMC13054822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.