Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41953141›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2026

Predicting Visual Outcomes in Congenital Posterior Lens Opacities: A Deep Learning Model Using Ultra-Widefield Fundus Images.

Chaokun Luo, Qingruo Zhang, Yuhui Pang, Anqi He, Xinyi Qiu, Ka Yi Chung, YongBin Lin, Zhuoling Lin, Wan Chen, Hui Chen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chaokun LuoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Qingruo ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Yuhui PangAier Glaucoma Institute, Hunan Engineering Research Center for Glaucoma with Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosis and Application of New Materials, Changsha Aier Eye Hospital, Changsha, China.
Anqi HeDepartment of Ophthalmology, General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, Guangzhou, China.
Xinyi QiuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Ka Yi ChungState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
YongBin LinState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Zhuoling LinState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Wan ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Hui ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Weirong ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model for the automatic segmentation of lens opacity projected shadow (LOPS) on ultra-widefield (UWF) fundus images and to predict visual outcomes in children with congenital posterior lens opacities (CPLOs). Design: A prospective single-center study. Participants: Children with CPLO who underwent surgery at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center in China from January 2023 to November 2023. Methods: Demographics, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), biomicroscopic assessments, and UWF fundus images were collected. A DL model based on U-Net architecture was implemented for the segmentation of total and dense LOPS and optic disc. The ratio of LOPS to optic disc was defined as shadow-to-optic disc ratio (SODR). The DL model was evaluated by confusion matrix and Dice coefficients. An optimal visual outcome was defined as a BCVA better than 0.30 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution. Factors correlated with optimal visual outcomes were identified by regression analyses, and predictive performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve. Main Outcome Measures: Pixel area of total and dense LOPS, total and dense SODR, and postoperative BCVA at a minimum 12-month follow-up. Results: Sixty eyes of 55 children with CPLO (mean age, 7.64 ± 3.73 years, 51.7% females) and 454 UWF fundus images were analyzed. The DL model achieved a sensitivity of 98.48% and a specificity of 91.62%, with Dice coefficients of 0.90, 0.83, and 0.84 for optic disc, total, and dense LOPS, respectively. Thirty-five eyes (58.3%) achieved optimal visual outcomes. A reduced dense-SODR was significantly correlated with optimal visual outcomes (odds ratio = 0.951, Conclusions: The LOPS on UWF fundus images can be accurately segmented by DL model. A dense-SODR ≤14.0 is associated with optimal visual outcomes, offering a novel, valuable predictor for visual outcomes in CPLO. Financial Disclosures: The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Indexed as

Congenital posterior lens opacitiesDeep learningShadow-to-optic disc ratioUltra-widefield fundus imaging systemVisual outcome

Identifiers

PMID41953141
PMCPMC13053735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.