ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Natural SARS-CoV-2 infection in farmed minks
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In 2020, the first disease outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in farmed minks Methods: To better understand the dynamics of viral spread and disease progression after natural infection, this study investigates the pathology, immunohistochemistry, virology, serology, proteomics, and the presence of Aleutian Disease Virus (ADV) in minks from an infected farm. A total of 45 minks were divided into four groups based on clinical health status and time of sampling: found dead before culling (FD, Results: Histopathological examination revealed that interstitial pneumonia was the most prominent SARS-CoV-2-related finding across all four groups, with more severe lesions seen in the FD and FDc groups. Histopathological changes were supported by viral antigen expression in the nose, trachea, and lungs, as well as in extra-respiratory tissues such as the intestine, spleen, and lymph nodes, in all groups. Highest viral RNA levels were found in nasal and throat swabs and nose and lung tissues. Lower levels were detected in the spleen, liver, and intestine, especially in the FDc animals. Serology confirmed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies in all groups, whereas immune-related proteomics on whole blood did not show a significant difference between the groups. Based on qPCR, over 57% of minks were co-infected with ADV. Discussion: Minks naturally infected with SARS-CoV-2 exhibit severe lung pathology and high viral loads across multiple organs. Additionally, severe lung lesions are also observed in animals without clinical signs, suggesting a potential zoonotic risk and viral spread in the absence of any clinical signs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.