Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41953090›Full record

ArticleJournal of exercise science and fitness2026

Alterations in knee biomechanics and motor performance following 3 months training with the Football+ and 11+ warm-up programs among amateur female players. A three-armed cluster allocated, non-randomized intervention study.

Mojtaba Asgari, Martin Hägglund, Benedikt Terschluse, Maximilian Sueck, Kevin Nolte, Marcus Schmidt, Thomas Jaitner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exercise science and fitness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mojtaba AsgariTraining and Movement Science Group, Institute for Sport and Sport Science, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Martin HägglundDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Benedikt TerschluseSports Scientist/Strength and Conditioning Coach Girls' and Women's Football Department, BVB09, Dortmund, Germany.
Maximilian SueckTraining and Movement Science Group, Institute for Sport and Sport Science, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Kevin NolteTraining and Movement Science Group, Institute for Sport and Sport Science, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Marcus SchmidtTraining and Movement Science Group, Institute for Sport and Sport Science, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Thomas JaitnerTraining and Movement Science Group, Institute for Sport and Sport Science, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This cluster alocated comparative study (DRKS00036644) primarily evaluated the effects of the Football+ and the established FIFA 11+ (the 11+) on knee biomechanical risk factors. A secondary outcome included performance measures and their retention following a 10-week no-intervention period. Methods: Three German amateur women's teams (24.3 ± 5.3 years, 1.73 ± 0.07 m, 64.3 ± 8.0 kg) completed the introductory sessions and were team allocated into the Football+ (n = 22), 11+ (n = 19), or control (n = 16) groups. Baseline assessment included a standardized 3D motion analysis of knee biomechanics during single-leg landing and cutting maneuvers and a performance test battery (sprinting, counter movement jump (CMJ), agility, and dribbling speed. Following a 3-month, twice-weekly supervised intervention, post-intervention testing was performed. A 10-week follow-up tested retention of the performance outcomes. Statistical significance was set at α ≤ 0.05. Results: ANOVA revealed significant time and time × group interactions across multiple knee biomechanical variables. The Football+ showed consistently larger magnitudes of change compared with the 11+, while the control group demonstrated limited changes (p = .005-0.047; η Conclusion: The Football+ and 11+ programs improved high-risk movement patterns associated with an increased risk of knee injury, with more consistent and larger effects observed for the Football+. Improvements in performance measures were observed only following the Football+, supporting its potential as a time-efficient, dual-purpose warm-up. The performance improvements were not maintained following the no-intervention period.

Indexed as

Injury preventionKnee biomchenicsThe Football+ programWomen's football

Identifiers

PMID41953090
PMCPMC13053740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.