ArticleInformatics in medicine unlocked2022
Patients' unmet information needs and gaps of obstetric ultrasound exam: A qualitative content analysis of social media platforms.
Article in Informatics in medicine unlocked, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: A healthy pregnancy is critical to ensure a healthy birth. Uncertainty and a lack of information often lead to anxiety during pregnancy, which may negatively affect health outcomes. Women become inquisitive during this period and increasingly seek out pregnancy-related health information online. In this study, we aim to understand the unmet information needs of obstetric ultrasound exams through a qualitative content analysis of social media posts. Methods: This is a qualitative content analysis study. We systematically gathered pregnancy-related consumer health questions from three public forums (Yahoo! Answers, BabyCenter, PregnancyForum) and one ultrasound internet forum (Reddit/ultrasound). We used a purposive sampling strategy. We only included questions about ultrasound exams, and we excluded any questions related the cost or training of the ultrasound exam. We also coded the emotion expressed by the women in the questions we included. After coding each question, we categorized the data into thematic topics and subtopics. Results: We collected a total of 435 questions that met the inclusion criteria. The thematic analysis included nine major themes. These themes include ultrasound exam preparation, exam expectancy, timing of the ultrasound exam, image interpretation, report interpretation, result explanation, women's emotions, and healthy lifestyle. In addition, we identified seventeenth subtopics. Conclusion: In this social media study, we discovered major information gaps that should be filled to better support health consumers' understanding of obstetric ultrasound exams and result reports. The information gaps could become barriers to healthy decision-making and create stress among pregnant women. More work needs to be done to mitigate the information gaps, such as providing more consumer-friendly and personalized information during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.