ArticleMilitary Medical Research2026
The cellular response capacity (CRC) as a novel immunomonitoring approach in sepsis.
Article in Military Medical Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inflammatory Stewardship-A Perspective for Active Management of Acute Inflammation.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early recognition of sepsis remains difficult in clinical practice because conventional humoral biomarkers such as C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) exhibit unfavorable, slow-release kinetics and rise hours after the onset of infection. Flow cytometry enables upstream, cell-based immunomonitoring, but its clinical use is restricted by poor standardization of fluorescence measurements. In this study, the neutrophil cellular response capacity (CRC) was developed and evaluated as a standardized approach for rapid assessment of systemic inflammation in bacteremia and sepsis. Methods: The CRC is based on a flow cytometry-based framework that defines a stable maximal stimulation reference point for neutrophil granulocytes. The CRC was evaluated in a human Results: In the bacteremia model, the CRC of neutrophil markers CD10, CD11b, and CD66b increased in a dose-dependent manner with increasing bacterial burden and detected inflammation at lower pathogen burdens than IL-6 and other humoral mediators, with a superior area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. In clinical sepsis, the CRC discriminated patients from age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers, with the CRC of CD11b showing the highest diagnostic performance. CRC values increased over time in patients with sepsis, consistent with immunological recovery. The maximal stimulation reference point for CD11b remained stable across inflammatory states, cohorts, and instruments. In addition, the CRC more precisely captured the onset and resolution of surgery-induced inflammation than conventional biomarkers. Conclusions: The CRC provides a rapid, standardized, and robust cell-based immunomonitoring tool that outperforms traditional humoral markers in experimental bacteremia and reliably identifies sepsis in clinical cohorts, strongly supporting its use as a novel biomarker for earlier, more precise sepsis diagnosis and monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.