ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting medium-to-giant coronary aneurysms in Kawasaki disease.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model using routinely collected clinical data to predict medium-to-giant coronary artery aneurysms (MGCAA) early in Kawasaki disease (KD). Methods: This retrospective study included 2,777 KD patients from two centers in China. Eleven ML algorithms were developed using clinical and laboratory data from electronic medical records (EMRs). Recursive feature elimination and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for feature selection and interpretability. The final model was internally and externally validated, with intercept-only recalibration to correct miscalibration, and evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The model was deployed as an R Shiny-based online prediction tool. Results: The support vector machine model implemented with kernlab (SVM kernlab) included seven key features: time to diagnosis, monocyte percentage, rash, eosinophil percentage, C-reactive protein, triglycerides, and neutrophil percentage. It achieved an AUC of 0.732 (95% CI, 0.597-0.866) in internal validation and 0.689 (95% CI, 0.611-0.767) in external validation. SHAP analysis provided both global feature importance and individualized explanations. Recalibration improved model calibration, and DCA demonstrated meaningful net clinical benefit across clinically relevant threshold probabilities. Conclusion: This study presents an interpretable ML model to predict MGCAA risk in KD using routine clinical data, supporting clinical risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.