ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2026
Is Fixation Strategy Associated With Complication Risk in Ogden Type IV Tibial Tubercle Avulsion Fractures? A Multicenter Study of the Tibial Tubercle Study Database.
Article in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The optimal surgical treatment of Ogden Type IV tibial tubercle avulsion fractures (TTAFs) remains controversial, given this injury pattern's rarity and its multiplanar involvement of the proximal tibial physis. Small, single-center studies suggest type IV fractures have higher complication rates and more variable fixation constructs than other TTAF types. The purpose of this study is to delineate fixation constructs among surgically managed type IV TTAFs and identify factors associated with postoperative complications. Methods: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted across 7 institutions examining surgically managed Ogden IV TTAFs treated between 2007 and 2022. Patients treated nonoperatively were excluded. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, treatment strategy (including fixation construct), and postoperative complications were analyzed. Fisher exact tests were used to compare complication frequency among fixation techniques. Results: Eighty-nine patients undergoing operative management of a type IV TTAF meeting study criteria were identified. The majority (72, 80.9%) were stabilized with screw-only constructs, while 9 (10.1%) were treated with pins or hybrid pin/screw constructs and the remainder (9.0%) were treated with a plate. Among screw-only constructs, 4.5 mm screws (49, 58%) with vertically stacked orientation (37, 51.3%) were the most common. Twenty-five patients (28.0%) experienced complications, the most common of which were implant irritation (14.6%) and wound problems (3.4%). One patient (1.1%) had postoperative compartment syndrome. When examining major complications (excluding implant irritation), the frequency was lower for screw-only constructs than other types of fixation (6.9% vs. 35.3%; Conclusions: In this large, multicenter cohort of surgically managed type IV TTAFs, considerable variation was observed among successful fixation constructs. Implant irritation was the most commonly observed complication. Other than implant irritation, the overall frequency of complications was low and lowest among screw-only constructs. Key Concepts: (1)A variety of fixation options exist for type IV tibial tubercle avulsion fractures.(2)There was reliable healing and good outcomes in the majority of cases.(3)Implant irritation is the most common complication in screw-only constructs.(4)Anterior-to-posterior screws can provide acceptable fixation for type IV fractures. Level of Evidence: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.