Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41952967›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2026

Providence Bracing in Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Scoping Review.

Jacob D Kodra, Harshavardhan Bollepalli, Carter J K White, John G Thometz, Xue-Cheng Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jacob D KodraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Harshavardhan BollepalliDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Carter J K WhiteDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
John G ThometzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Xue-Cheng LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Providence nighttime brace (PNB) is an emerging conservative treatment modality in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The purpose of this study was to map the extent and nature of published evidence on the PNB, to summarize outcomes and patient-reported effects, and to identify gaps for future investigation. Methods: This study followed Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A keyword search was queried in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science Core Collection, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Scopus databases. Included studies were original articles focused on PNB utilization in AIS treatment. Non-peer-reviewed, opinion, editorial, or review articles were excluded. Results: A total of 24 studies were included, encompassing 2,262 patients. Six studies compared outcomes to full-time orthoses; eleven examined ways to improve PNB success; three evaluated the PNB's impact on quality of life. The literature suggests the PNB consistently prevents curve progression in indicated patients, especially in curves measuring <35° and those with an apex at or below T9. Most comparative studies report that the PNB achieves similar outcomes to full-time orthoses when patients are appropriately selected. However, differences in study design, patient selection, and outcome definitions limit firm conclusions. The PNB was generally reported to have a manageable impact on quality of life. Innovations such as ultrasound custom fitting, predictive models, and temperature sensors may improve brace fit, adherence, and outcomes. Conclusions: The literature identifies the Providence brace as a viable, patient-compliant treatment in mild to moderate AIS. While the PNB shows promise, variability in study design and indications underscores the need for prospective, randomized studies. Researchers should use Scoliosis Research Society criteria for inclusion and assessment, as well as objective compliance measures when feasible. Continued innovation with predictive models, custom brace-fitting, and temperature sensors may further improve outcomes. Key Concepts: (1)The Providence nighttime brace (PNB) effectively prevents curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), especially in lumbar or thoracolumbar curves measuring <35°.(2)Most comparative studies suggest the PNB achieves similar outcomes to full-time orthoses in appropriately selected patients, but heterogeneity in study design, patient selection, and outcome definitions limits firm conclusions.(3)Preliminary evidence suggests the PNB may offer an acceptable quality of life profile, although current data are limited and further comparative studies using validated instruments are needed.(4)Prospective studies using Scoliosis Research Society criteria with standardized outcomes, predefined subgroups, and objective compliance measures are needed to solidify indications and patient education.(5)Predictive models, custom brace-fitting, objective compliance monitoring, and adjunctive physiotherapeutic exercises are promising innovations for improving PNB outcomes. Level of Evidence: V.

Indexed as

BracingProvidenceProvidence bracingScoliosisSpine

Identifiers

PMID41952967
PMCPMC13054609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.