ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026
Socioeconomic factors outweigh perceived built environmental influences on self-rated health among middle-aged and older adults in western China.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Previous environmental evidence has demonstrated that supportive environments can improve population health by reducing environmental hazards. However, the extent to which such environments can further enhance health outcomes by promoting physical activity and encouraging proactive health behaviors remains unclear once socioeconomic inequalities are considered. Method: A cross-sectional community survey was conducted among community-dwelling middle-aged and older residents in Nanchong, China. The validated Chinese version of the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale-Abbreviated (NEWS-A), the SF-36 General Health subscale, and the Chinese short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF) were used to measure perceived built environment, self-rated health and physical activity, respectively. A structural equation model (SEM) was employed to test whether the perceived built environment was associated with self-rated health via physical activity and body mass index. Model estimation utilized the WLSMV method to handle ordinal data, with model fit rigorously assessed using standard indices and a prior confirmatory factor analysis. Direct, indirect, and total effects were estimated with robust standard errors. Results: Among 3,753 participants (mean age 50.1 years; 39.5% men), the final SEM showed excellent fit. After adjustment for socioeconomic and demographic covariates, perceived built environment did not affect self-rated health (all Conclusion: After controlling socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, the perceived built environment showed no independent association with self-rated health. This suggests that social and economic gaps may outweigh and potentially obscure the health benefits of supportive neighborhood environments in similar contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.