Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41952962›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2026

Comparison of endoleak diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography angiography after endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Arjun Jagdeesh, Ved Kumar, Nigel Thomas, Simon Trigger, Seong Hoon Park, Madison Maas, Carolyn Isham, David Spinosa, Dipankar Mukherjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Arjun JagdeeshHonors College, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Ved KumarDepartment of Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Fairfax, VA.
Nigel ThomasDepartment of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Fairfax, VA.
Simon TriggerDepartment of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Fairfax, VA.
Seong Hoon ParkDepartment of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Fairfax, VA.
Madison MaasDepartment of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Fairfax, VA.
Carolyn IshamDepartment of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Fairfax, VA.
David SpinosaDepartment of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Fairfax, VA.
Dipankar MukherjeeDepartment of Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Fairfax, VA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Routine monitoring is necessary to detect endoleaks after treating abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Accurately diagnosing endoleak type is crucial to ensure a durable repair during secondary intervention. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been the standard for follow-up of patients following EVAR. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) became available to clinicians in the United States in 2021 and utilizes noniodinated contrast while minimizing radiation, which may prove beneficial for patients. Methods: Status post-EVAR patients being routinely monitored for endograft integrity, endoleak, and sac growth that were assessed by CEUS and CTA within 30 days of each other were retrospectively compared. Lumason was the contrast agent injected intravenously during real-time CEUS examination of the AAA sac and endograft. Endoleak detection and type, AAA sac size and volume compared with previous, stent graft integrity, and position and flow dynamics were determined and compared. Results: A total of 167 CEUS studies were performed in 95 consecutively enrolled post-EVAR patients with >1 cm/year sac expansion from February 2024 to December 2025 and reviewed by an experienced vascular radiologist. Forty-one CEUS exams from 38 patients had a comparable CTA within 30 days of the CEUS exam, and these patients retrospectively formed the patient population of this study. There was agreement in 27 of 41 CEUS-CTA pairs. CEUS and CTA endoleak diagnosis disagreed in seven patients. Three of the seven patients were found to have type 1 endoleak noted on CEUS and misdiagnosed by CTA, whereas one patient had type 3 endoleak and three patients had type 2 endoleak also misdiagnosed by CTA. CEUS achieved 97.14% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value (PPV), 85.71% negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.9857, outperforming CTA (78.57% sensitivity, 46.15% specificity, 75.86% PPV, 50% NPV, and AUC of 0.6621) ( Conclusions: CEUS imaging outperformed CTA for endograft visualization and endoleak diagnosis, in line with similar European studies. Real-time temporal visualization of endoleaks and elimination of iodinated contrast with CEUS exams give endovascular surgeons a beneficial complement to CTA to detect endograft endoleaks and optimize endovascular treatments during long-term follow-up of post-EVAR patients with AAAs.

Indexed as

Abdominal aortic aneurysmComputed tomography angiographyContrast-enhanced ultrasoundEndoleakEndovascular aneurysm repairRenal insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID41952962
PMCPMC13054273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.