ArticleCureus2026
Echocardiographic Assessment of Cardiovascular Hemodynamic Changes in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide, complicating a significant proportion of pregnancies. Cardiovascular maladaptation plays a central role in disease pathophysiology, yet routine echocardiographic evaluation is not universally practiced. The present study was conducted to evaluate cardiovascular hemodynamic alterations using two-dimensional echocardiography in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and to compare echocardiographic parameters across different severity groups. Materials and methods This hospital-based prospective observational study included 70 pregnant women beyond 20 weeks of gestation with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Participants were stratified for analytical comparison into mild (19 (27.1%)), moderate (28 (40.0%)), and severe (23 (32.9%)) groups based on systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels. All women underwent a comprehensive echocardiographic assessment, including systolic parameters (left ventricular volumes, cardiac output, total vascular resistance) and diastolic parameters (E/A ratio, deceleration time, isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT)). Continuous variables were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, and categorical variables using the chi-square test. Pearson correlation assessed associations between blood pressure and echocardiographic parameters. Results Progressive increases in left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes and cardiac output were observed with increasing disease severity (p < 0.001). Total vascular resistance decreased significantly across severity groups (p < 0.001). Diastolic dysfunction was present in 51 (72.9%) women and was more frequent in severe disease. The E/A ratio declined significantly with severity (p < 0.001). Significant correlations were noted between systolic blood pressure and cardiac output (r = 0.648, p < 0.001), and a significant negative correlation was observed with the E/A ratio (r = -0.612, p < 0.001). Severe disease was associated with higher rates of preterm delivery (17 (73.9%)), low birth weight (19 (82.6%)), and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (17 (73.9%)). Conclusion Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with significant systolic and diastolic hemodynamic alterations that correlate with disease severity and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Two-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation provides valuable insight into cardiovascular involvement in hypertensive pregnancy; however, the findings should be interpreted in the context of an observational study without predictive modeling. However, larger studies with appropriate comparator groups are required to further clarify its clinical and prognostic significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.