ReviewJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2026
Efficacy of tenoxicam for postoperative dental pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative pain commonly follows dental procedures, and appropriate analgesic selection plays a critical role in its management. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of tenoxicam compared with other pharmacological agents for postoperative dental pain control. Indexed databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, were searched through August 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for interventions. Nine randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and covered a range of dental procedures, including third molar extraction, endodontic treatment, orthodontic adjustment, and implant surgery. Comparators included placebo, ibuprofen, diclofenac, flurbiprofen, meloxicam, methylprednisolone, and rofecoxib. Pain outcomes were measured primarily with the Visual Analogue Scale at multiple postoperative time points. Across studies, tenoxicam showed analgesic efficacy that was generally superior or comparable to other agents, with several trials reporting statistically significant reductions in pain scores at both early and later postoperative intervals. Most studies had low overall risk of bias, although some raised concerns related to allocation concealment and outcome reporting. Tenoxicam appears to be an effective and well-tolerated option for postoperative dental pain management. Study heterogeneity and domain-level bias concerns indicate a need for additional high-quality trials to confirm these findings and support routine clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.