ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: a scoping review of prevalence, assessment tools, associated factors, and interventions.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of cigarette toxicants on sarcopenic obesity: An in silico network toxicology and molecular dynamics study.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the accelerating global population aging, the prevalence of sarcopenic obesity (SO) in older adults has been increasing year by year, which has become a major public health issue that seriously impacts the quality of life and threatens the health status of the older population. Objective: The review aimed to summarize the current status, assessment tools, influencing factors, and intervention measures related to SO among older adults, identify research gaps in the existing literature and provide a reference for future studies. Methods: The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework. Literature on the current prevalence, assessment tools, influencing factors, and interventions for older adults with SO was retrieved from the following databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Cochrane Library. The search timeframe was restricted from database inception to October 2025. Two researchers independently screened the research literature, extracted data, and summarized findings. Results: Forty-five studies were included, which were published between 2016 and 2025, with a marked increase in publications from 2021 to 2025. The prevalence of SO among older adults ranged from 2.52 to 34.62%, with notable variations across studies. Assessment tools were diverse, but a standardized evaluation framework was lacking. Influencing factors were categorized into four groups: sociodemographic factors, disease-related factors, psychosocial and behavioral factors, and nutritional factors. Intervention measures included exercise interventions, nutritional interventions, and multidomain interventions. Conclusion: The prevalence of SO among older adults varies considerably, and existing assessment tools lack a standardized framework and diagnostic thresholds that are not population-specific. Future efforts should integrate the characteristics of sarcopenia and obesity to develop predictive assessment tools specifically tailored for older adults with SO, while also focusing on the factors influencing SO to further refine intervention measures, aiming to slow disease progression and promote healthy aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.