Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41952805›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2026

Experience with new technology: Point-of-care magnetic resonance imaging in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Olivia R Keller, Ashmitha Arun, Avni Sanghvi, Prachi H Telkar, Chetan Chandulal Shah

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olivia R KellerCollege of Medicine, Lake Erie College of Medicine, Lakewood Ranch, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1649-311X
Ashmitha ArunDepartment of Nursing and Health Science, University of Miami, Coral Gables, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2924-0664
Avni SanghviCollege of Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7825-680X
Prachi H TelkarCollege of Medicine, St. George's University, University Centre Grenada, St. George's, Grenada, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4061-0632
Chetan Chandulal ShahDepartment of Radiology, Nemours Children's Health, Jacksonville, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8549-0202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging is a crucial component of the management of neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Previously, challenges associated with the transport of neonates to a traditional 1.5-3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machine have led to a reliance on ultrasound in the NICU, despite its limitations. Bedside availability of the neonatal MRI system has provided solutions to some of these challenges by decreasing the time of transport, providing continuous monitoring of the neonate, and cable management for lines and leads without an external magnetic field. We present our initial experience with the point-of-care NICU MRI through a clinical case. The point-of-care MRI successfully identified intracranial abnormalities, demonstrating its effectiveness in the NICU.

Indexed as

Cranial ultrasoundNeonatal brain imagingNeonatal intensive care unitNeonatal MRIPoint-of-care imaging

Identifiers

PMID41952805
PMCPMC13054317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.