ArticleSurgical neurology international2026
Direct carotid stenting with minimal predilation after embolic protection device crossing failure in cervical internal carotid artery dissection: A case report.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD) may cause acute ischemic stroke requiring endovascular reperfusion. When repeated early reocclusion occurs and a distal embolic protection device (EPD) cannot cross the dissected segment after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), the optimal strategy is uncertain. Case Description: A 70-year-old man with prior chronic subdural hematoma presented with right hemiparesis and aphasia (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 18). Magnetic resonance angiography showed left cervical ICAD without intracranial large-vessel occlusion. IVT with alteplase (0.6 mg/kg) was followed by aspiration thrombectomy, which achieved only transient recanalization with repeated early reocclusion of the internal carotid artery. Although the guidewire of a distal filter-type EPD crossed the dissection, the filter system could not be delivered. Under proximal balloon occlusion, we therefore performed minimal low-pressure predilation with small balloons and directly deployed a closed-cell carotid stent, obtaining good expansion and durable reperfusion (final modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 3). Because emergent stenting was unavoidable, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was loaded intraoperatively but withheld thereafter until 24-h imaging confirmed stability of a small post-procedural subarachnoid hemorrhage. No in-stent restenosis, reocclusion, or new infarcts occurred during follow-up; the modified Rankin Scale score was 3 at 3 months. Conclusion: This single-case experience suggests that, in cervical ICAD with repeated early reocclusion and distal EPD delivery failure, switching to proximal flow arrest, performing minimal low-pressure predilation, and proceeding to direct closed-cell carotid stenting can be a pragmatic bailout to secure sustained reperfusion. After prior IVT, a stepwise antiplatelet strategy - intra-procedural DAPT loading when emergent stenting is unavoidable, followed by withholding maintenance therapy until 24-h imaging confirms hemorrhagic stability - may help balance thrombotic and hemorrhagic risks, particularly in patients with a history of intracranial hemorrhage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.