ArticleSurgical neurology international2026
Intranasal exosome therapy in Coffin-Siris syndrome: Clinical evaluation of three children.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coffin-Siris Syndrome (CSS) is a rare neurodevelopmental condition most often caused by pathogenic variants in the ARID1B gene, a key component of the SWI/SNF (SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable) chromatin-remodeling complex. Despite multidisciplinary interventions, functional improvement in CSS remains limited. Exosome-based therapeutics have recently gained attention for their potential neuroregenerative and neuroprotective properties. Case description: This case series included three children with genetically confirmed ARID1B-related CSS who received intranasal exosome therapy in addition to ongoing rehabilitation. Adaptive functioning was evaluated before and after treatment using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition (Vineland-3). Post-treatment assessments were performed 4-6 weeks after completion of the final intranasal exosome treatment cycle. Following the therapies, all patients demonstrated increases in the Adaptive Behavior Composite (ABC) score. The mean score increased from 83.0 pre-treatment to 90.7 post-treatment, corresponding to a mean improvement of 7.7 points (approximately +9%). Improvements were observed primarily in communication, daily living, and socialization domains, while motor-related changes were more modest yet clinically observable. No adverse events were observed during treatment. Given the small sample size, retrospective design, and concurrent rehabilitation therapies, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Conclusion: These preliminary observations suggest that intranasal exosome therapy may represent a feasible and well-tolerated adjunctive approach to support adaptive functioning in children with CSS. Further controlled studies are warranted to confirm efficacy and elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.