Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41952506›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026

Quantification of Soil Organic Carbon by Shifted-Excitation Raman Difference Spectroscopy with Machine Learning and Common Mode Rejection.

Ginger W Brown, Natalia V Solomatova, Naomi K Yamaoka, Calum Cole, Paige Prescott, Matthew D Kowal, Luke Melo, Miayan Larose, Sadegh Shokatian, Edward Grant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ginger W BrownDepartment of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1 Canada.
Natalia V SolomatovaMiraterra Technologies, 199 W Sixth Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Y 1K3, Canada.
Naomi K YamaokaMiraterra Technologies, 199 W Sixth Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Y 1K3, Canada.
Calum ColeMiraterra Technologies, 199 W Sixth Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Y 1K3, Canada.
Paige PrescottMiraterra Technologies, 199 W Sixth Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Y 1K3, Canada.
Matthew D KowalDepartment of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1 Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-5255-4418
Luke MeloDepartment of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1 Canada.
Miayan LaroseMiraterra Technologies, 199 W Sixth Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Y 1K3, Canada.
Sadegh ShokatianMiraterra Technologies, 199 W Sixth Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Y 1K3, Canada.
Edward GrantDepartment of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1 Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5264-2644

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) is an important indicator of soil health and productivity in agricultural and natural ecosystems. Conventional measurement techniques, such as combustion analysis, yield accurate results but consume time and material resources. Raman spectroscopy combined with machine learning offers a rapid and ultimately field-deployable alternative. However, Raman measurements of soils face challenges due to matrix effects, such as fluorescence interference and light absorption by organic matter, which reduce the accuracy of machine-learning predictions. Here, we measure SOC in a data set of 400 American farm soils and apply machine learning to Shifted-Excitation Raman Difference Spectroscopy (SERDS) spectra, a fluorescence-free Raman scattering method. Our results show that for higher organic carbon concentrations, light absorption nonlinearly attenuates Raman spectroscopic features. This degrades the prediction accuracy of conventional machine-learning multivariate regression models for higher SOC levels, particularly when calibrated on data sets skewed to contain few high-SOC standards. A 200-sample synthetic data set of balanced mineral-organic mixtures serves to isolate the effects of light absorption and data set skew on Raman signal intensities. This work also compares two SERDS spectral preprocessing algorithms for soil analysis: Asymmetric Least Squares and Common-Mode Rejection. We find that Common-Mode Rejection and a nonlinear, tree-based machine learning model provide the most accurate results in the face of overwhelming fluorescence and nonlinear matrix effects inherent to soil samples.

Identifiers

PMID41952506
PMCPMC13103924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.