Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41952430›Full record

SynthesisJournal of diabetes2026

The Role of Negative Pressure Therapy in Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Meta-Analysis.

Hai Du, Tao Jiang, Renqun Mao, Xiaofan Yang, Zhenbing Chen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of diabetes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hai DuDepartment of Hand Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Tao JiangDepartment of Hand Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Renqun MaoDepartment of Hand and Foot Surgery, Shenzhen Nanshan People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaofan YangDepartment of Hand Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhenbing ChenDepartment of Hand Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2828-866X

Funding

Medical Science and Technology Research Foundation of Guangdong Province B2024010National Natural Science Foundation of China 82370838National Natural Science Foundation of China 82472566the Health Science and Technology Project of Hubei Province WJ2025Z007the Key Research and Development Program of Hubei Province 2024BCB039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a severe complication, often leading to amputation. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an advanced treatment option requiring further consolidated evidence. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of NPWT versus conventional wound care for DFU, focusing on wound healing, amputation prevention, and adverse events (AEs). We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception until October 2025. Twenty-three RCTs involving 2086 participants were included. Two reviewers independently selected studies. Outcomes included wound healing rate, ulcer area reduction, amputation rate, and adverse events. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. NPWT significantly improved the wound healing rate (OR 4.48, 95% CI 2.58-7.77), led to a greater reduction in ulcer area (SMD 1.26, 95% CI 0.70-1.82), and substantially lowered amputation risk (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.64) compared to conventional care. No significant difference was found in adverse events (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.56-1.71). Subgroup analyses confirmed benefits across ages, follow-up durations, and control dressings. The healing benefit was most pronounced in less severe ulcers (Wagner grade < 2), while amputation protection was consistent across severities. NPWT is an effective and safe strategy for DFU, significantly accelerating wound healing and reducing amputation risk, supporting its integration as a cornerstone adjunctive therapy.

Indexed as

Diabetic FootNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyWound HealingAmputation, SurgicalHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomeamputationdiabetic foot ulcermeta‐analysisnegative pressure wound therapywound healing rate

Identifiers

PMID41952430
PMCPMC13062642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.