ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Synthetic Nanofiber Wound Matrix for the Treatment of Chronic Wounds.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced Functional Wound Dressings in Precision Surgery: Immunometabolic Reprogramming, Bioadaptive Biomaterials, and Intelligent Regenerative Interfaces.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic wounds, including Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs), Venous Leg Ulcers (VLUs) and Pressure Ulcers (PUs), present significant challenges for the patients, clinicians and healthcare systems. There remains a strong need for novel and effective technologies to accelerate the healing of these wounds. The objective of this prospective, single-arm pilot study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a novel nanofiber wound matrix for the treatment of chronic lower extremity wounds refractory to standard-of-care treatment at a single centre. A total of 15 patients with 15 chronic wounds (5 DFUs, 8 VLUs and 2 PUs) were included in this study. These wounds were non-healing to previous standard-of-care treatments for an average of 4 weeks. They were all treated with the novel nanofiber wound matrix with weekly clinical evaluation and re-application for a total duration of four (4) weeks, per the study protocol. The average wound area reduction (WAR) was 83.6% upon 4 weeks of treatment with the application of the subject wound matrix, as an adjunctive measure to the standard of care. Additionally, seven (7) of the 15 wounds (46.7%) completely healed starting from Week 3, and the average complete healing time was 13.9 days. These results demonstrated accelerated healing effects of the subject wound matrix, when compared to the standard of care reported in literature, where the average WAR was at 62.9% at Week 12, six (6) of the 18 wounds (33.3%) were completely healed within 12 weeks, and the average complete healing time was 49.0 days. These results demonstrated that the subject wound matrix is a safe and effective novel technology in treating chronic wounds, providing significant clinical and economic benefits for patients with various chronic wounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.