ArticleBiophysical journal2026
Accurate determination of the preferred aggregation number of a micelle-encapsulated membrane protein dimer.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The structures of membrane proteins, such as the C99 dimer, are commonly resolved using protein nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), which employs micelles as membrane mimics. Protein NMR is not able to determine the aggregation numbers of micelles, however, and, while several experimental techniques exist for quantifying the aggregation numbers of pure micelles, these are generally not applied to micelle-encapsulated proteins. Molecular-dynamics simulations of the C99 dimer and other transmembrane proteins have been performed to complement micelle-phase protein structure studies. In these cases, it has often been assumed that the aggregation number is the same as that of the pure, empty micelle. Here, using a multiscale simulation approach combining coarse-grained and all-atom models, we provide a convenient method for testing that assumption while also accounting for the finite-size effects inherent in computer simulations of micelle self-assembly. Employing large, unbiased, coarse-grained molecular-dynamics simulations of dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) surfactant and C99 protein dimer self-assembly, we determined the radius of gyration to be 21.6 ± 2.0 Å for the micelle-encapsulated dimer and 16.0 ± 1.0 Å for the pure DPC micelle. Using these radii of gyration, we performed all-atom simulations of DPC-encapsulated C99 protein dimers with preferred aggregation numbers of 100 and 54 DPCs to test the effect of using an accurate versus a naive estimate of aggregation number on the structure of the transmembrane protein dimer. Through atomistic simulations, we determined that the structure of the transmembrane protein dimer is significantly impacted by the aggregation number of the micelle. In addition, the number of surfactant defects depends on the aggregation number, which in turn impacts the extent of water penetration and the stability of the protein's secondary structure. Taken together, our results demonstrate the importance of using an accurate estimate of the aggregation number in simulations of micelle-encapsulated protein structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.