Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41952338›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2026

Accurate determination of the preferred aggregation number of a micelle-encapsulated membrane protein dimer.

Jonathan J Harris, George A Pantelopulos, John E Straub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan J HarrisDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215-2521, USA.
George A PantelopulosDepartment of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215-2521, USA; Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-0520, USA.
John E StraubDepartment of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215-2521, USA. Electronic address: straub@bu.edu.

Funding

Probing the roles of membrane and cholesterol on Aβ biogenesis and prion protein interactionsR01GM107703 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI STRAUB, JOHN E., THIRUMALAI, DEVARAJAN · 2015 to 2022
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structures of membrane proteins, such as the C99 dimer, are commonly resolved using protein nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), which employs micelles as membrane mimics. Protein NMR is not able to determine the aggregation numbers of micelles, however, and, while several experimental techniques exist for quantifying the aggregation numbers of pure micelles, these are generally not applied to micelle-encapsulated proteins. Molecular-dynamics simulations of the C99 dimer and other transmembrane proteins have been performed to complement micelle-phase protein structure studies. In these cases, it has often been assumed that the aggregation number is the same as that of the pure, empty micelle. Here, using a multiscale simulation approach combining coarse-grained and all-atom models, we provide a convenient method for testing that assumption while also accounting for the finite-size effects inherent in computer simulations of micelle self-assembly. Employing large, unbiased, coarse-grained molecular-dynamics simulations of dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) surfactant and C99 protein dimer self-assembly, we determined the radius of gyration to be 21.6 ± 2.0 Å for the micelle-encapsulated dimer and 16.0 ± 1.0 Å for the pure DPC micelle. Using these radii of gyration, we performed all-atom simulations of DPC-encapsulated C99 protein dimers with preferred aggregation numbers of 100 and 54 DPCs to test the effect of using an accurate versus a naive estimate of aggregation number on the structure of the transmembrane protein dimer. Through atomistic simulations, we determined that the structure of the transmembrane protein dimer is significantly impacted by the aggregation number of the micelle. In addition, the number of surfactant defects depends on the aggregation number, which in turn impacts the extent of water penetration and the stability of the protein's secondary structure. Taken together, our results demonstrate the importance of using an accurate estimate of the aggregation number in simulations of micelle-encapsulated protein structures.

Indexed as

Membrane ProteinsMicellesMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein AggregatesProtein MultimerizationPhosphorylcholinedodecylphosphocholineMembrane ProteinsMicellesPhosphorylcholineProtein Aggregates

Identifiers

PMID41952338
PMCPMC13200062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.