ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Survival by Detection Pathway in Patients With Lung Cancer-A Nationwide Descriptive Epidemiological Study in Japan.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Survival by Detection Pathway in Patients With Lung Cancer-A Nationwide Descriptive Epidemiological Study in Japan.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Greater understanding of the prognosis for patients with lung cancer in Japan according to detection pathway would clarify the effect of population-based screening programs and the related diagnostic environment. We explored the clinical characteristics and net survival (NS) of patients with lung cancer by detection pathway with Japanese National Cancer Registry (NCR) database of patients registered between 2016 and 2020. Eligible patients were categorized based on detection pathway: Screening, Incidental, and Other groups. We estimated 1, 2, and 3 year NS. Of 565,044 patients with lung cancer in the NCR, 563,244 met the eligibility criteria and were included in this study: 95,081 patients in the Screening (16.9%), 254,569 in the Incidental (45.2%), and 200,850 in the Other groups (35.7%). In the Screening, Incidental, and Other groups, 69.5%, 88.6%, and 83.4% of patients, respectively, were aged ≥ 65 years, and 50.5%, 49.6%, and 14.0% of patients, respectively, had localized disease at diagnosis. The most common initial treatment was surgery in the Screening (62.5%) and Incidental (46.2%) groups, while chemotherapy was most frequently used in the Other group (48.6%). The 3 year NS was 75.2% (95% confidence interval: 74.9%-75.6%) in the Screening group, 56.3% (56.0%-56.6%) in the Incidental group, and 29.4% (29.2%-29.7%) in the Other group. In the subgroup analysis, 3 year NS for localized disease was 96.3% (95.9%-96.7%), 83.9% (83.6%-84.3%), and 76.9% (76.1%-77.6%), respectively, for the Screening, Incidental, and Other groups. Screening may play a key role in early detection and is likely to contribute to survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.