ArticleNursing open2026
Nutrition Knowledge in Oncology Nursing: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Care and Practice Implications.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer-related malnutrition affects 40%-90% of oncology patients and contributes to increased treatment toxicity and mortality. Nurses play a pivotal role in early nutritional screening and intervention, yet their nutritional competencies remain insufficiently investigated, particularly in specialised oncology settings.
aimTo evaluate the nutritional competencies of nurses, considering both their general nutritional knowledge and their specific expertise related to nursing practice.
designCross-sectional study.
methodsA total of 91 oncology nurses from Northern Italy participated, completing a validated nutritional knowledge questionnaire and a self-assessment of their competencies. Associations between demographic factors and knowledge scores were analysed.
resultsThe mean knowledge score was 20.0 ± 1.9 out of 30, indicating moderate understanding. Nurses aged 51-60 and those with over 10 years of experience scored significantly higher (p < 0.05). No significant association was found between education level and knowledge scores. Nurses reported low confidence in using malnutrition screening tools, and self-assessed competencies did not correlate with actual knowledge.
conclusionsOncology nurses possess moderate nutritional knowledge, with professional experience contributing more than formal education. Implementing comprehensive nutrition education at the undergraduate level, continuous professional development and fostering interprofessional collaboration are essential to enhance the quality of care and improve patient outcomes in oncology settings. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings highlight the need for enhanced nutritional education for oncology nurses to improve their confidence and competence in nutritional care. This is crucial for providing optimal care and improving patient outcomes in oncology settings. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The study underscores the importance of involving oncology nurses in continuous education and interprofessional collaboration, ultimately benefiting patients through better management of nutrition-related issues in cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.