ArticleAustralian occupational therapy journal2026
Victorian primary school teachers' perspectives on collaboration with occupational therapists.
Article in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Victorian primary school teachers' perspectives on collaboration with occupational therapists.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEffective interprofessional collaboration between primary school teachers and occupational therapists is crucial in fostering inclusive learning environments. Occupational therapists work in schools to assist children who require additional support through the recommendation of capacity building strategies. Teachers play a fundamental role in ensuring these recommendations are implemented consistently, making collaboration with occupational therapists important for student performance and participation. However, various factors impact this collaborative process. There is a lack of research on Australian teachers' perspectives regarding collaboration with occupational therapists. Therefore, this study investigated the perspectives of Victorian primary school teachers on collaborating with occupational therapists to identify ways to enhance collaboration.
methodsThis study employed an exploratory qualitative research design. Seven Victorian primary school teachers were recruited through a combination of convenience and snowball sampling. Participants completed online semi-structured interviews, sharing their personal perspectives and experiences on collaborating with occupational therapists in schools. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: No consumer or community involvement.
findingsTwo themes were generated from the data, each with several subthemes. The first theme, 'We need to have everyone working on the same page' represented a misalignment between the professions and was supported by two subthemes: Defining dynamics and clarifying contributions and Talk to me: clear, concise and frequent. The second theme, Bridging the resource gap, presented various resource constraints and included three subthemes titled: School rules, All hands on deck and Teach me, teach you.
conclusionMisalignments in role understanding and communication between teachers and occupational therapists hinder effective collaboration. Moreover, limited resources and inadequate support systems make it difficult for occupational therapists and teachers to better align their practices. Outside of supportive policy changes, strengthening this collaboration requires greater appreciation of each other's role demands, concise communication methods, and supportive information sharing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.