ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2026
A simple and reliable method for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of nano- and microplastics in organs for controlled preclinical studies.
Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundToxicity studies of microplastics increasingly emphasize the importance of particle retention, transformation, and physicochemical properties within biological systems, as these factors critically influence hazard identification and dose-response interpretation. However, quantitative and qualitative analyses of microplastics in biological matrices remain technically challenging, and many existing digestion-based methods can alter particle properties, thereby confounding toxicological outcomes. Herein, we propose a novel methodology to provide quick, easy, non-destructive, cost-efficient, and reliable outcomes by offering a particle collection method for microplastics as-present in organs using proteinase K (PK) digestion and a simple quantification method based on ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometry.
resultsThe test microplastic samples comprised three spherical polystyrene (0.1, 1, and 100 μm), two fragmented polystyrene (1 and 100 μm), one spherical polyethylene (10 μm), one fragmented polyethylene (100 μm), and two fragmented polypropylene (1 and 100 μm). Particles as-present in organs were successfully collected by conducting PK tissue digestion at 5 µg PK per mg dried tissue. The collected particles were then quantified using a standard curve, with absorbance measured at 750 nm. Spiking experiments with microplastics in mouse lung and mussel tissues showed > 90% accuracy and recovery for all test particles. Because the PK-based particle collection method is non-destructive, the collected particles can be further used to evaluate their physicochemical properties, such as size, shape, composition, and oxidative potential. However, the plastics treated with both acids and alkalis exhibited significant morphological, optical, and chemical changes, indicating that these methods are destructive to particles.
conclusionTherefore, this simple, non-destructive approach enables quantitative and qualitative analyses for laboratory toxicological studies and qualitative identification of microplastics in unknown biological samples, providing a valuable tool for future toxicity and environmental research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.