Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41952177›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2026

Risk assessment reasoning and decision-making by ambulance professionals in patients with a transient loss of consciousness: a qualitative study.

Lucia G Uit Het Broek-Creemers, Lilian C M Vloet, Hester Vermeulen, Sivera A A Berben

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucia G Uit Het Broek-CreemersResearch Department of Emergency and Critical Care, School of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Lucia.uithetBroek@han.nl.
Lilian C M VloetResearch Department of Emergency and Critical Care, School of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hester VermeulenScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sivera A A BerbenResearch Department of Emergency and Critical Care, School of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Sivera.Berben@han.nl.

Funding

Nationaal Regieorgaan Praktijkgericht Onderzoek SIA RAAK.PUB05.017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with a transient loss of consciousness (T-LOC) present a complex clinical situation for ambulance professionals. The challenge arises from the complexity of the diverse aetiologies associated with T-LOC and the demanding nature of the pre-hospital work environment. Insights into the experiences, dilemmas, and challenges faced by ambulance professionals in the risk assessment and decision-making in this patient category could help to understand the support they need. Our study aimed to explore the risk assessment reasoning and decision-making process of ambulance professionals in patients with a T-LOC in current practice.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study with focus group interviews in an emergency medical services (EMS) organisation in the Netherlands. Through purposive sampling, ambulance professionals were recruited for two online focus group interviews. An interview guide, based on literature and preliminary individual interviews, was used. The focus group interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsA total of eleven participants participated in two focus group interviews. Three main themes emerged: (1) Clinical reasoning covering the (initial) approach of ambulance professionals on scene, the T-LOC specific assessment, complexity of the aetiology of T-LOC, and the medical conveyance decision, (2) Collaboration describing the difficulties and facilitating factors in the interprofessional collaboration with other healthcare professionals in the chain of emergency care (e.g., general practitioners, emergency physicians, etc.) and the involvement of patients and relatives, (3) Professionalism describing the influence of professionals' experiences (e.g. professional maturity), the sense of responsibility and accountability of the ambulance professional, and their subsequent need for reflection.

conclusionAmbulance professionals follow a structured approach for the clinical assessment of a patient with a T-LOC. In addition to their professional experience, the complexity of the symptom and the patient's context play a crucial role in the risk assessment reasoning and decision-making process. Ambulance professionals collaborate with other healthcare professionals to enhance their process, with varying experiences. There is a delicate balance between professionals' sense of responsibility and accountability. A non-conveyance decision is considered precarious by professionals, and adequate support from management, education and interprofessional collaboration is required to feel confident in their decision-making.

Indexed as

AmbulancesClinical Decision-MakingClinical ReasoningDecision MakingEmergency Medical ServicesUnconsciousnessAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsParamedicsQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentClinical reasoningDecision-makingEmergency medical servicesRisk stratificationTransient loss of consciousness

Identifiers

PMID41952177
PMCPMC13217765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.