ArticleBMC public health2026
Temporal patterns in mortality from type 2 diabetes and digestive system cancers-an epidemiological analysis of the US population from 1999 to 2023.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveType 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is closely associated with digestive organ malignancies; however, population-level data remains scarce regarding mortality trends where both conditions coexist. This study aims to assess the national trends and disparities in mortality rates for deaths in which both T2DM and digestive organ malignancies were listed on the death certificate among middle-aged and elderly individuals in the United States from 1999 to 2023. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing the CDC WONDER database, this study analyzed deaths among U.S. individuals aged ≥ 45 years from 1999 to 2023. Deaths were included if both T2DM (ICD-10: E11) and digestive organ malignancies (ICD-10: C15-C26) were listed on the death certificate as either underlying or contributing causes. The crude mortality rate (CDR) and age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) per 100,000 people were calculated. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to estimate the average annual percent change (AAPC) and identify significant trend shifts.
resultsA total of 94,676 deaths involving both T2DM and digestive organ malignancies were identified. The overall AAMR increased significantly from 1.82 (95%CI 1.74–1.91) to 4.93 (95%CI 4.82–5.04) per 100,000, with an AAPC of + 4.13% (95%CI 3.83–4.56, P < 0.05). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of this upward trend, with a significant acceleration after 2013 (APC + 7.07%, 95%CI 5.91–8.60, P < 0.05). Significant disparities were observed across all subgroups: males had consistently higher AAMR than females (AAMR 6.80 vs 3.47; AAPC + 4.39% vs + 3.91%, all P < 0.05); the Hispanic/Latino population had the fastest growth (AAPC + 5.56%, P < 0.05); the West region showed the most pronounced increase (AAPC + 6.58%, P < 0.05); and rural areas had persistently higher AAMR than urban metropolitan areas (AAMR 5.79 vs 3.90, P < 0.05). While crude mortality was highest in adults aged ≥ 85 years, the 45–54 age group exhibited the steepest annual increase (AAPC + 7.4%, P < 0.05).
conclusionsBetween 1999 and 2023, mortality involving both T2DM and digestive malignancies in the U.S. rose sharply, with significant acceleration in the last decade. The pronounced disparities across gender, race, and geography—particularly the heavy burden in rural and Hispanic populations—necessitate targeted public health interventions and integrated metabolic-oncological screening protocols to mitigate these increasing burdens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.