ReviewEuropean review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity2026
Qualitative assessment of mobility in older adults: a scoping review of process-oriented behavioural criteria.
Review in European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesMobility decline is a strong predictor of falls, fractures, and disability in older adults and is associated with sarcopenia, kinesiophobia, reduced physical activity, and poorer quality of life. Early identification is essential to mitigate deterioration. Yet, most clinical assessments emphasise performance outcomes (e.g., time, repetitions) and often overlook early qualitative signs of mobility deterioration. Process-oriented assessments evaluating movement quality may offer greater sensitivity but are seldom used given time, resource, and training constraints. Digital technologies could overcome barriers, but practical evidence-based tools remain limited. This review aimed to identify process-oriented behavioural criteria for qualitatively assessing functional mobility in older adults, establishing a foundation for digital mobility assessments.
methodsFollowing Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, six databases (MEDLINE Complete, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, Sport Discus, Embase, Web of Science) were searched from inception to September 2025. Six reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Inductive analysis identified behavioural criteria and tool characteristics.
resultsTwenty-four studies met inclusion criteria. Most assessed balance and gait using ordinal scales. Berg Balance Scale and Dynamic Gait Index showed high reliability and validity; Mini-BEST and POMA demonstrated moderate properties. Feasibility was inconsistently reported. Limitations included moderate clinical burden, ceiling/floor effects, reliance on trained raters, equipment requirements, and lack of a standardised framework.
conclusionsProcess-oriented assessments are limited by inconsistent psychometric quality, feasibility constraints, and a lack of standardisation, highlighting a critical gap in qualitative assessment. SIGNIFICANCE/IMPLICATIONS: Validated process-oriented criteria may enable scalable digital mobility assessment integration, allowing for earlier detection, tailored interventions, reduced falls risk, and streamlined clinical workflows without extensive training or specialised equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.