ReviewAllergy2026
Hypersensitivity to Excipients in Drugs: An EAACI Position Paper.
Review in Allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hypersensitivity Reactions to Biologics: Advances in Diagnosis and Management.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drugs contain active pharmaceutical ingredients and excipients, compounds which enhance the pharmacokinetics, stability and palatability of the pharmaceutical formulation. While most drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) are caused by active ingredients, excipients may also be involved. Excipient-related DHR are easily overlooked and may lead to repeated anaphylaxis in patients exposed to pharmaceutical formulations containing different active ingredients. We performed an extensive review of the literature to provide practical recommendations on when to suspect and how to diagnose and manage excipient hypersensitivity. Where literature was limited, the collective experience of the authors was taken into consideration. Excipient hypersensitivity should be suspected in patients with a history of anaphylaxis to multiple drugs with chemically unrelated active ingredients and specific drug classes such as oral laxatives and injectable depot steroids or progestogens. Polyethylene glycol, methylcelluloses, gelatine, povidone and mannitol were identified as the most common culprits of DHR. DHR evaluation should include review of the product monograph to ascertain the presence of possible culprit excipients. Specific diagnostic tests for excipients should be performed when appropriate, including skin, in vitro and provocation testing with pure excipients and drugs with and without the excipient as controls. We provide consensus-based excipient-specific recommendations on diagnostic testing based on best available evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.