ArticleClinical rheumatology2026
Macrophage activation syndrome in systemic lupus erythematosus: risk factors and outcomes.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify risk factors and outcomes of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) in febrile patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and to compare clinical characteristics between MAS occurring at initial SLE diagnosis and during established disease.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records of SLE patients admitted to Seoul St. Mary's Hospital between 1990 and 2025 and identified those with MAS. Age- and sex-matched febrile SLE patients without MAS were selected as controls in a 1:3 ratio. Clinical and laboratory variables were compared, and logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with MAS.
resultsAmong 1,512 febrile SLE patients, 54 (3.6%) developed MAS. Hypoalbuminemia was independently associated with MAS occurrence (OR 29.86, 95% CI 1.58-564.22; P = 0.024), while renal involvement was inversely associated (OR 0.01, 95% CI 0.00-0.24; P = 0.004). MAS occurred as initial presentation of SLE in 28 patients (51.9%) and during established disease in 26 patients (48.1%), but outcomes did not differ significantly by onset timing. The in-hospital mortality rate of MAS patients was 11.1%, and overall survival did not differ significantly across treatment modalities.
conclusionMAS is a rare but life-threatening complication of SLE. Its presentation is nonspecific, and prognosis appears independent of onset timing or treatment approach. Further large-scale, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and better delineate clinical and laboratory features of MAS in SLE. Key Points • Hypoalbuminemia was identified as a potential predictor of SLE-associated MAS, independent of proteinuria or lupus nephritis. • Clinical features and survival outcomes were comparable between MAS presenting at initial SLE diagnosis and during established disease. • Early recognition of MAS remains critical, given its severe and potentially life-threatening course in SLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41952030What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.