ReviewPulmonary therapy2026
Practical Considerations for Managing Transitions from Parenteral Prostacyclins to Oral Selexipag in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
Review in Pulmonary therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prostacyclin pathway represents a foundational pathway in the treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Parenteral prostacyclin pathway agents (PPAs) are often used for treatment of severe PAH but their broader use is limited by administration difficulties, including a need for continuous infusion, administration side effects, and complexities of a chronic indwelling catheter. Administration of the prostacyclin receptor agonist selexipag, an oral therapy with more than 10 years' clinical experience, may be more favorable for some patients. However, treatment protocols for transitioning from parenteral PPAs to oral selexipag are lacking. Here, we describe practical considerations for managing such transitions. The transition process requires an individualized and shared decision-making approach between the patient and multidisciplinary team to optimize treatment outcomes. Key considerations include patient selection criteria, setting expectations, transition setting (inpatient vs outpatient), transition speed, dose adjustment, and clinical follow-up. Appropriate patient candidates for transition to oral selexipag should be clinically stable and selected based on a comprehensive evaluation using validated risk scores and hemodynamic parameters. Expectations and realistic treatment goals should be discussed collaboratively and must include the possibility of returning to parenteral PPAs if clinically indicated. Transition protocols should be flexible and tailored to each patient. Outpatient transition may be considered depending on transition speed, the patient's ability to follow dosing instructions, and access to emergency care if needed. Speed of the transition to oral selexipag varies based on individual patient needs. Close monitoring and long-term follow-up are essential following transitions to maximize success and patient safety. In summary, transitioning from parenteral PPAs to oral selexipag can be challenging and complex. However, success is achievable for suitable patients through careful planning, setting transparent expectations, and an individualized approach with close monitoring and long-term follow-up.Graphical abstract available for this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.