ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Delivering tactile stimuli via mobile browsers: A method for remote multisensory research.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Visual and tactile motion cues enhance the categorisation of novel object shapes.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Online methods are becoming an essential part of the behavioral scientist's toolkit. While the remote presentation of visual and auditory stimuli has been shown to be reasonably accurate (Bridges et al., 2020), less is known about the feasibility of delivering tactile stimuli via the browser. In this study, we extend remote experimentation to the tactile domain by replicating a well-established multisensory phenomenon - the redundant target effect (RTE) - using Android smartphones. The RTE, wherein response times are faster to multisensory (bimodal or trimodal) than unimodal stimuli, was robustly replicated in an online sample using a browser-based task. In addition to the behavioral replication, we evaluated the timing accuracy and precision of visual, auditory, and tactile (vibration) stimuli presented via mobile browsers. Visual and auditory stimuli exhibited small, consistent lags, while vibration stimuli showed a greater delay. Further analysis indicated that much of this delay was attributable to the gradual ramp-up of smartphone vibration motors, rather than limitations of the browser itself. These results support the feasibility of using consumer mobile devices to study tactile and multisensory processing in uncontrolled environments. The significance of the current manuscript is twofold: first, we demonstrate that scalable, at-home user studies can incorporate haptics without bespoke apps; second, we provide benchmark timing data to inform the feasibility of future research implementing tactile perception measures in remote behavioral research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.