ArticleDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Child with inflammatory tinea capitis after visiting a barbershop].
Article in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the case of a 9-year-old boy presenting with inflammatory tinea capitis (kerion celsi) after repeated visits to a barbershop. Trichophyton tonsurans was identified by fungal culture, while Staphylococcus aureus and Aspergillus spp. were detected as accompanying microorganisms. The infection was considered highly likely to be barbershop-associated, most probably resulting from inadequately reprocessed hair-cutting or shaving instruments. An initial misdiagnosis as dermatitis, followed by treatment with topical hydrocortisone, was associated with further clinical progression. This case underscores the importance of early mycological work-up, including direct microscopy, fungal culture and/or polymerase chain reaction, with histopathological examination in selected cases, as well as the prompt initiation of guideline-concordant systemic antifungal therapy. In cases of bacterial superinfection, adjunctive antibiotic treatment may be indicated. From a public health perspective, rigorous instrument reprocessing in barbershops, together with appropriate counselling and hygiene measures in the patient's close contacts and environment, is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41951961What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.