SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
The effect of a learning curve on outcomes of vestibular schwannoma surgery: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery can be complex, with the risk of incurring significant neurological deficit or other complication. Our systematic review aimed to investigate the presence of a ‘learning curve’ for various outcomes in VS surgery. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, with the Medline, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane library and Web of Science databases searched on the 30/4/25 for articles investigating the learning curve in VS surgery. Information extracted included age, gender, surgical approach, surgery duration, extent of resection, facial nerve (FN) outcome, hearing preservation (HP), complications, and further treatment. The time or patient number intervals that the learning curve was assessed at was recorded as well. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was utilised to determine risk of bias. Twelve studies were identified, reporting on 4059 VS cases. FN function was reported in eleven studies, all of which suggested improved FN outcomes with increased surgical experience. Hearing preservation was demonstrated to be statistically significant in four studies. Studies sporadically reported on surgical duration, resection and complication rates, with no clear learning curve identified for any of these outcomes. Our review identified the presence of a learning curve with regards to FN outcome in VS surgery with a plateau in initial surgical learning curve being obtained in the later cases of an early career surgeon’s experience. A learning curve was also found for HP in cases where this was an operative goal. Evidence demonstrating a learning curve for other outcomes is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.