ArticleScientific reports2026
Pedigree-assisted genotype imputation enables cost-effective genomic prediction in Penaeus vannamei.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Local Enrichment of Multi-SNP Markers Improves Genomic Prediction from Low-Density Genotyping in Pacific White Shrimp.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic selection in Penaeus vannamei has long been constrained by the high cost of dense genotyping. To address this limitation, we evaluated genotype imputation from a low-density 1 K panel to a medium-density 55 K panel of the "Yellow Sea Array No. 1" and examined its impact on genomic prediction for harvest body weight in P. vannamei. A four-generation pedigree including 30 great-grandparents, 39 grandparents, 100 parents, and 608 offspring was genotyped using the 55 K panel. A two-step experimental design was implemented to (i) assess the performance of different imputation algorithms under reference population scenarios with varying proportions of siblings, and (ii) compare six alternative reference population structures incorporating parents, ancestors, and siblings. Genotype imputation using the pedigree-based method FImpute v3.0 consistently achieved higher accuracy than the population-based method Beagle v5.5. Using this pedigree-assisted approach, imputation accuracy increased from 0.73 when only parental genotypes were used to 0.84 with the inclusion of 10% siblings, and subsequently plateaued at 0.87-0.90 when sibling representation reached 20%. Across the six reference population structures, imputation accuracy was primarily driven by the availability of parental genotypes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 in the absence of parents to 0.88-0.89 when both parents and ancestral generations were included. Accuracy remained high when both parents were available (0.84-0.87 with siblings; 0.73 without siblings) but declined substantially when only one parent was genotyped (0.65-0.68). Imputation accuracy was positively associated with both minor allele frequency (MAF) and linkage disequilibrium (max r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.