Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41951868›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Pedigree-assisted genotype imputation enables cost-effective genomic prediction in Penaeus vannamei.

Mianyu Liu, Qiang Fu, Ping Wang, Guangfeng Qiang, Kun Luo, Baolong Chen, Sheng Luan, Jie Kong, Pao Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mianyu LiuWuxi Fisheries College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Wuxi, 214081, China.
Qiang FuState Key Laboratory of Mariculture Biobreeding and Sustainable Goods, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao, 266071, Shandong, China.
Ping WangHainan Zhongzheng Aquatic Science and Technology Co., Ltd. Dongfang, Hainan, 572633, China.
Guangfeng QiangState Key Laboratory of Mariculture Biobreeding and Sustainable Goods, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao, 266071, Shandong, China.
Kun LuoState Key Laboratory of Mariculture Biobreeding and Sustainable Goods, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao, 266071, Shandong, China.
Baolong ChenState Key Laboratory of Mariculture Biobreeding and Sustainable Goods, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao, 266071, Shandong, China.
Sheng LuanState Key Laboratory of Mariculture Biobreeding and Sustainable Goods, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao, 266071, Shandong, China. luansheng@ysfri.ac.cn.
Jie KongState Key Laboratory of Mariculture Biobreeding and Sustainable Goods, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao, 266071, Shandong, China. kongjie@ysfri.ac.cn.
Pao XuWuxi Fisheries College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Wuxi, 214081, China. xup@ffrc.cn.

Funding

Key R&D Program of Shandong Province, China No. 2024LZGC038National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFD2400202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection in Penaeus vannamei has long been constrained by the high cost of dense genotyping. To address this limitation, we evaluated genotype imputation from a low-density 1 K panel to a medium-density 55 K panel of the "Yellow Sea Array No. 1" and examined its impact on genomic prediction for harvest body weight in P. vannamei. A four-generation pedigree including 30 great-grandparents, 39 grandparents, 100 parents, and 608 offspring was genotyped using the 55 K panel. A two-step experimental design was implemented to (i) assess the performance of different imputation algorithms under reference population scenarios with varying proportions of siblings, and (ii) compare six alternative reference population structures incorporating parents, ancestors, and siblings. Genotype imputation using the pedigree-based method FImpute v3.0 consistently achieved higher accuracy than the population-based method Beagle v5.5. Using this pedigree-assisted approach, imputation accuracy increased from 0.73 when only parental genotypes were used to 0.84 with the inclusion of 10% siblings, and subsequently plateaued at 0.87-0.90 when sibling representation reached 20%. Across the six reference population structures, imputation accuracy was primarily driven by the availability of parental genotypes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 in the absence of parents to 0.88-0.89 when both parents and ancestral generations were included. Accuracy remained high when both parents were available (0.84-0.87 with siblings; 0.73 without siblings) but declined substantially when only one parent was genotyped (0.65-0.68). Imputation accuracy was positively associated with both minor allele frequency (MAF) and linkage disequilibrium (max r

Indexed as

GenomicsGenotypePedigreePenaeidaeAlgorithmsAnimalsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGenotyping TechniquesMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrediction AlgorithmsGenomic PredictionGenotype imputationPenaeus vannameiSNP array

Identifiers

PMID41951868
PMCPMC13219476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.