ArticleScientific reports2026
Automated quantification of coronal balance in spinal deformity: a safety-aware clinical workflow.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The assessment of coronal balance is critical for cosmetic appearance and quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), yet its manual quantification remains constrained by substantial workflow demands and inherent subjectivity. While artificial intelligence has shown promise in automated Cobb angle measurement, robust and clinically safety-aware solutions for coronal balance parameters are still lacking. In this study, we developed and validated a robust HRNet-based automated system for quantifying Shoulder Height Difference (SHD), Pelvic Obliquity (PO), and C7 Plumb Line Offset (C7 offset) using a dataset of 847 full-spine radiographs. Beyond anatomically driven topological constraints, we integrated a novel Clinical Safety Gating Mechanism that proactively suppresses unreliable outputs in cases of anatomical ambiguity, functioning as a safety gating by design. The system achieved millimeter-level precision (mean absolute error: 0.86-2.45 mm) and demonstrated strong agreement with manual reference measurements (Pearson r > 0.95), with overall performance approximating the inter-rater variability among senior spinal surgeons. Importantly, the deterministic algorithmic consistency of the system mitigates human fatigue and subjective fluctuation, offering theoretical advantages for future longitudinal assessments. Collectively, this work positions the automated coronal balance system not merely as a measurement tool, but as a safety-aware quality safety gating mechanism. These findings validate the technical feasibility and internal safety of the model, providing a robust foundation for large-scale clinical data auditing and future prospective studies on long-term patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.