ArticlePharmaceutical research2026
Effects of Airway Generation Depth on Particle Deposition Behaviour in the Main Respiratory Airways-A Computational Modelling Study.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEffective inhaled drug delivery depends on formulation, device, and a clear understanding of aerosol transport in the respiratory tract. This study explores how lower airway anatomical complexity affects airflow and particle deposition in the main respiratory airways.
methodsSeven 3D bronchial models with varying airway generational depths were developed. Numerical simulations were conducted using the discrete phase model (DPM) to simulate aerosol transport and deposition under transient inspiratory flows at inhalation peak flow rates of 60 and 120 L/min.
resultsOur results showed that simplified models with three bronchial generations could underestimate the deposition efficiency in the main respiratory airways by up to 65.6% compared to the seven-generation lower airway model. Additionally, disparities in deposition outcomes and flow characteristics diminished with increasing lower airway complexity, with minimal changes in flow dynamics and deposition observed beyond the model with six bronchial generation.
conclusionsThis study suggests that airway models incorporating at least up to the 6th generation of bronchial branching may be required to sufficiently capture the implications for inhalation therapy design and the development of reliable in silico testing frameworks. Notably, insufficient lower airway detail not only compromises lung deposition estimates but also affects airflow dynamics throughout the entire respiratory tract, including the upper airway. This study highlights the importance of retaining detailed geometry in the design of inhalation therapies and the development of in silico testing frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.