SynthesisProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2026
Evaluation and management of transient lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after surgery for Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO): a systematic review.
Synthesis in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe evaluation and management of lower urinary symptoms (LUTS) experienced in the immediate post-operative period after benign prostatic obstruction surgery (BPO), remain unclear. Aim of our study is to systematically report the evidence on management of post-operative transient urinary symptoms after BPO surgery.
methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses checklist (PRISMA). PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched up to March 2025. Studies evaluating pharmacotherapy, phytotherapy and/or physical treatment for post-operative transient LUTS in men aged were evaluated. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included.
resultsOverall, nine RCTs were included. Among the surgical techniques investigated, most data were available for transurethral resection of the prostate. The methods used to assess post-operative LUTS, as well as the timing of evaluation, varied considerably across studies. The most commonly submitted questionnaire was the International Prostate Symptom Score, and the most frequently performed diagnostic tool was uroflowmetry. Anticholinergic drugs seems to have the greatest efficacy in improving post-operative LUTS, even if the level of evidence is low. In contrast, alpha-blockers did not appear to offer significant additional benefits in this setting of patients. Phytocomplexes (Graminex G63, Curcumin complexes) were effective in improving patients' quality of life (QoL) after BPO surgery. Pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME) also demonstrated a reduction in symptom-related bother.
conclusionCurrent strategies for evaluating and managing transient postoperative LUTS are heterogeneous, and available evidence remains limited. Anticholinergic agents and phytotherapeutic compounds are among the most commonly prescribed treatments, though their efficacy is suboptimal. High-quality randomized trials are needed to provide robust clinical recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41951848What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.