ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
Haploidentical transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide is not inferior to 9/10-MUD transplantation with ATG in patients with myeloid malignancies.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The selection of the best available donor is crucial for patients' outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). In the absence of fully Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) -matched donors, mismatched unrelated donor (9/10-MUD) or haploidentical donor (haplo) can be considered. No consensus has been reached on the best alternative and large real-world data are warranted to support decisional processes. We compared the outcome of 1413 patients with myeloid malignancies undergoing allo-SCT from 9/10-MUD with anti-thymocyte-globulin (ATG) (n = 1134) or haplo with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy, n = 279) between 2009 and 2020 in 48 German centres. Donor type with related graft versus host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis showed in multivariable analysis no significant impact on acute GvHD development, both grade II-IV (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.69-1.19, p = 0.469) and severe (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.82-1.81, p = 0.319), nor on moderate to severe chronic GvHD (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.59-1.03, p = 0.077). Moreover, no influence from donor type was observed on GVHD-relapse-free survival (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.92-1.36, p = 0.227), progression-free survival (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.95-1.51, p = 0.121), non-relapse mortality (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.81-1.51, p = 0.542) and overall survival (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.91-1.48, p = 0.235). Our real-world data demonstrate that haplo allo-SCT with PT-Cy is not inferior to 9/10-MUD allo-SCT with ATG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41951842What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.