ArticlePlanta2026
Characterization and comparison of the complete chloroplast genome of Rubroshorea palembanica: an endemic and threatened dipterocarp.
Article in Planta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionGenomic characterization of R. palembanica's chloroplast reveals key markers and evolutionary links, advancing molecular resources for conserving threatened Dipterocarpaceae species. The Dipterocarps have an important ecological and economical role and are a major component of tropical forests in Southeast Asia. They are well-known as sources both for their timber and non-timber products. Genome references become fundamental resource and can be used as best practice in achieving biodiversity conservation efforts and goals. This study aims to characterize chloroplast genome of Rubroshorea palembanica compared to other Dipterocarpaceae species, construct phylogenetic relationship, and identify potential molecular markers for inferring genetic diversity and phylogenetic analysis. The chloroplast genome of R. palembanica was 150,558 bp in size. A typical quadripartite structure occurred, comprising a large single-copy region of 83,511 bp, a small single-copy region of 19,839 bp, and a pair of inverted regions of 23,604 bp each. There were 128 unique genes, including 84 protein coding genes, 36 transfer RNA genes, and 8 ribosomal RNA genes. A total of 159 simple sequence repeats and 190 long repeats were identified. Eight highly variable loci were identified and they have the potential for genetic markers. Those genes were rps16-trnQ, trnQ-psbK, psbK-psbI, psbI-trnS, psbB-psbT, psbT-psbN, psbN-psbH, and psbH-petB. The phylogenetic position of R. palembanica was nested in the Rubroshorea clade, which was more closely related to R. macrophylla. These findings provide genomic information that could support conservation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41951826What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.