ReviewNature cell biology2026
A guide to using embedded ethics in human stem-cell-based embryo model research.
Review in Nature cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering the human endometrium at the intersection of development and reproduction.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Everyday ethical attentiveness in stem cell-based model research.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- Morally relevant features warranting ethical oversight in human stem cell-based embryo models.Nature cell biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human stem-cell-based embryo models (hSCBEMs) offer unprecedented opportunities for basic and translational research. However, the rapid pace of scientific developments in the field challenges the slower, traditional modes of ethics evaluation. To facilitate responsible research and governance, and ensure public trust, we propose using 'embedded ethics' as a purpose-anchored, dynamic, iterative and integrative approach where ethicists and scientists engage in continuous dialogue to ethically assess ongoing research. We outline a nested benchmarking strategy to periodically evaluate the scientific and ethical status of hSCBEMs within a project, using the human embryo as a reference and weighting criteria along a hierarchy of features that chart embryo-likeness, completeness and the developmental stage modelled. Embedded ethics guides the definition of decision points and ethical boundaries through an iterative assessment of project purpose and ethical and regulatory frameworks, and enables early identification of emerging issues and the co-construction of responsible paths forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41951755What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.