ReviewNature cell biology2026
Morally relevant features warranting ethical oversight in human stem cell-based embryo models.
Review in Nature cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Balancing flexibility and ethical oversight: Japan's regulatory framework for human stem cell-based embryo model research.Stem cell reports · 2026Article
- Everyday ethical attentiveness in stem cell-based model research.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- Human stem cell-based embryo models: innovation, ethics, and policy.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Stem cell-based embryo models as a tool for reproductive biology.Molecular human reproduction · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stem cell-based embryo models provide innovative ways to explore the principles of human development but also pose new challenges for regulation. Recent guidelines have argued for case-by-case evaluation of stem cell-based embryo model research but it is still unclear what exactly such oversight should consider. Here we argue that effective review requires the identification of a set of attributes by which to evaluate research proposals. To define these, the underlying ethical values and morally relevant biological features present in embryo models must be identified to enable the practical implementation of oversight. We propose that developmental stage, tissue/organ integrity, fetal potential and the capacity to form neural circuits should be used together for evaluation purposes. We also highlight the importance of the wider context, including the proposed uses of embryo models, public perception and individual researcher responsibilities, and thus provide a general framework for regulatory consideration of human embryo model research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.